Women's Rights; Accomplishments of Individuals
Advocate for Women’s Rights: Dr. Lydia Sayer Hasbrouck
1827-1910
On a fateful day in her young life, Warwick’s Lydia
Sayer applied for admission to the Seward Institute in Florida. 
The very intelligent, attractive, athletic, and independent-minded girl would have been eager to continue her education. She was rejected because she refused to lay aside what would later be called “bloomers” for more traditional dress.
 “As I left…I fairly bathed my soul in an agony of tears and silent prayers,” she later said, “I registered a vow that I would stand or fall in the battle for women’s physical, political and educational freedom and equality.”
Lydia was not intimidated by anyone, no matter how powerful –she even wrote  to President Lincoln to ask for an appointment to office.
Lydia  was wearing the bloomer outfit years before Amelia Bloomer popularized them. She trained as a physician, and became one of the most vocal and staunchest supporters of women’s dress reform and suffrage in America, founding a women’s dress reform newspaper, The Sibyl.
Warwick’s Bloomer Girl – Lydia Sayer Hasbrouck by S. Gardner
   On a fateful day in her young life, Lydia Sayer applied for admission to the Seward Institute in Florida.  The very intelligent, attractive, athletic, and independent -minded girl would have been eager to continue her education. One wonders if it had ever occurred to her that the practical garments she had adopted at an early age – long before Amelia Bloomer ever popularized them-- would be a problem.  But problem there was, and she never did attend Seward Institute. She was rejected because she refused to lay aside what would later be called “bloomers” for more traditional dress. “As I left…I fairly bathed my soul in an agony of tears and silent prayers,” she later said, “I registered a vow that I would stand or fall in the battle for women’s physical, political and educational freedom and equality.” Thereafter she became one of the most vocal and staunchest supporters of women’s dress reform and suffrage in America.
   Lydia was born on Dec. 20, 1827 in Sayerville, a hamlet of Warwick near Bellvale.  She was the daughter of Benjamin Sayer and Rebecca Forshee.  As a child she was fearless, self-reliant, skilled in horsemanship and the domestic arts, and keenly interested in books and learning.  She finished her education elsewhere-- at Miss Galatian’s Select School, the Elmira High School, and Central College.  Around 1849 she became keenly interested in the health disciplines of hydropathy, or the ‘water cure’.  This social movement promoted what today would be called a holistic approach to health.  Water cure enthusiasts advocated a vegetarian diet, moderate exercise, sensible clothing, avoidance of alcohol, and exercise, along with cleansing the patient with a soothing wrap of wet sheets. Shortly after 1853 Lydia entered the Hygeia-Therapeutic College in New York City and graduated as a doctor of medicine.
   Dr. Lydia Sayer went to Washington D.C. and practiced there, lecturing in neighboring cities on the tyranny of fashion.  While there she became the Washington correspondent for the Middletown Whig Press, a paper with liberal and reformist positions on many issues. She eventually married its owner John Hasbrouck in a simple common-law ceremony at the Sayer home on July 27, 1856, less than a month after establishing a reformist newspaper of her own, The Sibyl. The only concession she made in her wedding garb was that her bloomer outfit was cut from white cloth.
   The archive of the Historical Society contains issues of The Sibyl from 1856 through1863.  Here one finds a wealth of information of interest to progressive minded ladies and gentlemen of the day:
   “Ever since the agitation of Dress Reform, newspapers, physicians, and people in general have been convinced that the present style of dress was blighting to woman’s physical being; yet, with but few exceptions, none have shown themselves practical reformers….Upon this point we wish to be understood, in advocating Dress Reform.  It is merely as a physiological reform, to elevate the weakened stamina of the race, and it not to be engrafted in the woman’s rights movement toward the elective franchise.  Though we may sustain them all, yet this reform is individualized, and of a higher importance than all else; for until woman is physically freed from her bonds, she is unfitted, in a great measure, for the active duties of trade, or a profession, or the arena of political strife...”
   “Most of the ladies who have retained the Reform Dress are wives and mothers.  Many had suffered from the effects of weight or pressure, until the weakened muscles cried for release..”
   “…the Abbe de Deguessy observed in a sermon, ‘Women now-a-days forget, in the astonishing amplitude of their dresses, that the gates of Heaven are very narrow.’  This recalls an incident we witnessed the other Sabbath…A great rumpling, smashing and crushing startled us at the door, and looking around to see what the matter was, we witnessed a lady, well hoped and spangled, trying to crush the unwieldy folds, floating in heavy luxuriance over her rotund hoops.  At last she succeeded in clearing the door…She passed on up the borad aisle, filling it completely, and rattling her hoops and silks against either side.  Reaching the seat, she solved the dilemma of how she was to enter it, by crushing, and crowding, and folding, until at last she was safely seated.  It struck us as being and unprofitable task, this laboring so hard to make oneself uncomfortable.  Woman has great endurance, truly.”
   --The Sibyl, Vol. 1, No. 2, July 15, 1856
   Dr. Lydia continued her activities on behalf of women’s freedom on many fronts, as well as dress reform, for her entire life.  A glimpse of her personality and tenacity is seen in this article from the Franklin Repository and Transcript of Nov. 14, 1860:
   “Mrs. Dr. Lydia Sayer Hasbrouck, of Orange County, New-York, who insists that a woman should not be taxed unless she is allowed to vote, has thought to shame the collector out of his deman by offering to work out her road tax.  The doctress, having somewhat passed the bloom of youth, made no impression upon the stony official, and therefore, instead of paying under protest, as some of her sisters do, she went upon the road and drove a cart.”
   She lived most of her adult life with her husband in Middletown; one cannot but think what she would have been if her family had ‘reined her in’ at an earlier age—if that was possible—or if the Seward Institute had turned a blind eye to her eccentric dress.